Journal of the History of Sexuality
After all, friendships are platonic by definition, right? Platonic friendship specifically refers to friendship between two people who could, in theory, feel attracted to each other. If you experience these feelings and decide to keep what you have, your friendship remains platonic. Friendships fulfill an important social need, and they can look different for everyone. You go to concerts, have similar taste in movies, and enjoy cooking and hiking together. You also have sex on occasion. Neither one of you wants a relationship, and romantic feelings have never come up. But sometimes, when the moment feels right, you go for it. If you have a crush or something stronger on one of your friends, maintaining a friendship is still possible.
As a result of Sharon Marcus. Sharon Marcus's Between Women: Friendship, Desire, and Marriage in Victorian England is an important and bold work, one that sets out en route for change our understanding of the dynamics and cultural valences of female relationships during the mid-nineteenth century. Drawing arrange a wide range of fiction after that nonfiction texts, including fashion magazines, children's stories, letters and autobiographical writings, canonical novels, and more, Marcus explores women's friendships, life partnerships, and homoerotic appeal. Juxtaposed with rich historical detail, her textual close readings serve as cautionary case studies in how relationships amid Victorian women may point scholars toward new interpretations of even familiar collective documents. The result is an affable work that may be read along with profit by graduate students and boss scholars in the fields of nineteenth-century British history, literature, and gender before sexuality studies. Marcus argues that all the rage fiction and memoirs alike, women's friendships serve multiple functions of powerful affecting significance. Such friendships reinforced femininity after that licensed forms of agency [that] women were discouraged from exercising with men, especially the right to assert claims over each other's affections and en route for enter into nonexclusive relationships, even although they also enabled women to add each other's matrimonial projects 2—3. For now, in a middle-class society that a lot segregated the sexes, femininity was equally offered to and claimed by girls and women as an appropriate application for female desire.
You can change your city from at this juncture. We serve personalized stories based arrange the selected city. Know what keeps Dutch kids so happy. Mark Zuckerberg shares the reason why he wore the same clothes everyday; here's why some popular names prefer wearing the same styles. Let's work together en route for keep the conversation civil.
A lot of of our ebooks are available designed for purchase from these online vendors:. A lot of of our ebooks are available all the way through library electronic resources including these platforms:. They pored over magazines that described the dangerous pleasures of corporal castigation. A few had sexual relationships along with each other, exchanged rings and vows, willed each other property, and lived together in long-term partnerships described at the same time as marriages. But, as Sharon Marcus shows, these women were not seen at the same time as gender outlaws. Their desires were fanned by consumer culture, and their friendships and unions were accepted and constant encouraged by family, society, and basilica. Far from being sexless angels defined only by male desires, Victorian women openly enjoyed looking at and constant dominating other women. Their friendships helped realize the ideal of companionate adoration between men and women celebrated as a result of novels, and their unions influenced politicians and social thinkers to reform marriage ceremony law. Through a close examination of literature, memoirs, letters, domestic magazines, after that political debates, Marcus reveals how relationships between women were a crucial cog of femininity.